• Home
  • About
  • Consulting
  • Papers and Articles

LegalTowns

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« The Bronx is Next, Ctd.
The Affordable Housing Plan »

Does NYC Need Middle-Income Housing?

May 4, 2014 by Honey Berk

Seth Pinsky, who headed the NYCEDC under Mayor Bloomberg, says no, according to an article in this week’s Real Estate Weekly; and he hopes that Mayor de Blasio’s delayed affordable housing plan will focus mainly on creating units for low-income residents, who really have no market options remaining.

Pinsky’s is an interesting analysis. Basically, he seems to be saying that if the city builds a lot of middle-income housing, it may deflate the housing market pressures that are causing middle-class relocation — a phenomenon that should be sustained, because it improves the city’s marginal neighborhoods. In so doing, the city may also take some pressure off the poor, but only by leaving them in their current, decrepit units. If, on the other hand, the city builds a lot of low-income housing, then the very poor will get fresh new apartments, which will represent an improvement in their living standards; and the city’s middle-class will continue to respond to the increasing expense of prime locations by relocating in patterns that improve the city’s marginal neighborhoods. At first glance, the first approach sounds self-defeating, while the second approach sounds like a win-win.

The problem is that, historically, we’ve tried the second approach. We’ve had the experience of building large numbers of fresh, clean units for low-income residents, and this did not work out very well. The housing projects of the 1950s-70s enjoyed very short honeymoons before they turned into urban dystopias. Sociologists had a number of theories about what went wrong (e.g., the scale of the developments, their concentrations of poverty, elevation from the street, lack of ownership). We don’t really know what combination of factors went wrong in public housing, which is all the more reason to be cautious about making the same mistakes, again. As a counterpoint, middle-income housing in New York City (and elsewhere) has worked — whether in the form of Mitchell-Lama rental apartments, limited-equity cooperatives, or simply market-built modest housing units in suburban-zoned neighborhoods. In addition, middle-income New Yorkers are not without options. Accordingly, they have some leverage, and the city’s housing policies ought to acknowledge it.

I’m sympathetic to Pinsky’s analysis, and I do think middle-class housing pressures have had a beneficial effect on many of the city’s formerly marginal neighborhoods. And obviously — as challenging as it can be to live on a moderate income in greater New York — the situation is much more desperate for those who are genuinely poor. But Pinsky’s approach strikes me as too simple, for a couple of reasons. First, there’s no way that even the most ambitious middle-class housing proposal from City Hall would result in enough new units, in a short enough time, to deflate the market pressures that are reviving the neighborhoods on the frontiers of gentrification — or to move those frontiers deeper into the city’s fabric. Second, there’s scant evidence, in the history of urban planning, that public efforts to develop large numbers of new housing units, exclusively for the poor, can result in the kinds of neat-and-tidy improvements to urban poverty that proponents of such efforts would like to see. In fact, these efforts almost always backfire.

Ideally, the regulation of land use would be liberal enough for development to keep up with demand, across the various tranches of the city’s real estate market. But it’s not, and this means that additional efforts have to be made to advocate for the development types that are most needed. Today’s city needs more housing for everyone.

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Dystopia, Housing / Limited Equity, Planning Theory |

  • Archives

    • September 2017 (5)
    • August 2017 (4)
    • July 2017 (1)
    • June 2017 (2)
    • March 2017 (1)
    • February 2017 (1)
    • January 2017 (2)
    • December 2016 (1)
    • November 2016 (1)
    • October 2016 (2)
    • August 2016 (4)
    • July 2016 (5)
    • June 2016 (3)
    • April 2016 (5)
    • January 2016 (2)
    • December 2015 (1)
    • November 2015 (3)
    • October 2015 (3)
    • September 2015 (2)
    • June 2015 (3)
    • May 2015 (2)
    • March 2015 (1)
    • February 2015 (3)
    • January 2015 (1)
    • September 2014 (1)
    • August 2014 (2)
    • July 2014 (1)
    • June 2014 (1)
    • May 2014 (8)
    • April 2014 (7)
    • March 2014 (3)
    • December 2013 (1)
    • November 2013 (4)
    • October 2013 (9)
    • September 2013 (1)
    • August 2013 (6)
    • July 2013 (5)
    • June 2013 (4)
    • May 2013 (5)
    • April 2013 (3)
    • March 2013 (6)
    • February 2013 (14)
    • January 2013 (19)
    • December 2012 (7)
    • November 2012 (3)
    • October 2012 (4)
    • September 2012 (2)
    • August 2012 (8)
    • July 2012 (5)
    • June 2012 (4)
    • May 2012 (11)
    • April 2012 (4)
    • March 2012 (3)
    • February 2012 (9)
    • January 2012 (6)
    • December 2011 (6)
    • November 2011 (5)
    • October 2011 (8)
    • September 2011 (3)
    • August 2011 (5)
    • July 2011 (5)
    • June 2011 (4)
    • May 2011 (8)
    • April 2011 (6)
    • March 2011 (2)
    • February 2011 (4)
    • January 2011 (4)
    • November 2010 (4)
    • October 2010 (1)
    • September 2010 (2)
    • August 2010 (3)
  • Categories

    • Art (53)
    • Books & Articles (24)
    • Building Codes (25)
    • Classic Cases (3)
    • Classical World (11)
    • Common Law Urbanism (49)
    • Courtyards and Alleys (6)
    • Dystopia (10)
    • Eminent Domain (7)
    • Euclidean Zoning (40)
    • Federalism (7)
    • Housing / Limited Equity (28)
    • Individual Rights (25)
    • Israel (4)
    • Land Surveying (7)
    • Late Victorian (35)
    • Law (26)
    • Leases (2)
    • Lower Manhattan (19)
    • Maps (10)
    • Mood Zoning (1)
    • Mortgages & Notes (7)
    • New Jersey Law (22)
    • Planning Theory (38)
    • Procedure (1)
    • Rail & T.O.D. (17)
    • Spotlights (44)
    • The Bronx (14)
    • Town Greens (15)
    • Trusts & Estates (9)
    • Uncategorized (36)
  • Pages

    • About
    • Consulting
    • Papers and Articles

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: