• Home
  • About
  • Consulting
  • Papers and Articles

LegalTowns

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« New Jersey Land Use Update
A Tale of Two States »

NJ Eminent Domain Reform

March 14, 2013 by Honey Berk

The New Jersey Senate is considering legislation that would amend the Local Redevelopment and Housing Law (LRHL) to reflect the clarified blight prerequisite from the Gallenthin decision, and also to incorporate a response to the due process concerns that were raised in the DeRose case.

♦  S-2447 would rewrite the ambiguous language of 40A:12A-5(e) to clarify the blight requirement for takings.

The statute presently reads:

(e)    A growing lack or total lack of proper utilization of areas caused by the condition of the title, diverse ownership of the real property therein or other conditions, resulting in a stagnant or not fully productive condition of land potentially useful and valuable for contributing to and serving the public health, safety and welfare.

Post amendment, it would read:

(e)    A growing lack or total lack of proper utilization of areas caused by the condition of the title, diverse ownership of the real properties therein or other similar conditions which impede land assemblage or discourage the undertaking of improvements, resulting in a stagnant and unproductive condition of land potentially useful and valuable for contributing to and serving the public health, safety and welfare, which condition is presumed to be having a negative social or economic impact or otherwise being detrimental to the safety, health, morals, or welfare of the surrounding area or the community in general.

♦ The bill would create two distinct classes of redevelopment areas: condemnation and non-condemnation. Councils would be required to choose a class when directing their planning boards to investigate the potential for redevelopment among certain parcels, and future actions would be limited by their choices.

♦  The bill would strengthen the requirements for noticing property owners in potential redevelopment areas, particularly with regard to eminent domain in proposed condemnation redevelopment areas.

The bill is sponsored by two Democrats, Jeff Van Drew (Cape May) and Ron Rice (Essex). S-2447 cleared the Community and Urban Affairs committee with unanimous support (5-0) earlier this month. If you’re interested in how the states are tackling eminent domain issues in the post-Kelo landscape, then the markup is worth a look.

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Eminent Domain, New Jersey Law |

  • Archives

    • September 2017 (5)
    • August 2017 (4)
    • July 2017 (1)
    • June 2017 (2)
    • March 2017 (1)
    • February 2017 (1)
    • January 2017 (2)
    • December 2016 (1)
    • November 2016 (1)
    • October 2016 (2)
    • August 2016 (4)
    • July 2016 (5)
    • June 2016 (3)
    • April 2016 (5)
    • January 2016 (2)
    • December 2015 (1)
    • November 2015 (3)
    • October 2015 (3)
    • September 2015 (2)
    • June 2015 (3)
    • May 2015 (2)
    • March 2015 (1)
    • February 2015 (3)
    • January 2015 (1)
    • September 2014 (1)
    • August 2014 (2)
    • July 2014 (1)
    • June 2014 (1)
    • May 2014 (8)
    • April 2014 (7)
    • March 2014 (3)
    • December 2013 (1)
    • November 2013 (4)
    • October 2013 (9)
    • September 2013 (1)
    • August 2013 (6)
    • July 2013 (5)
    • June 2013 (4)
    • May 2013 (5)
    • April 2013 (3)
    • March 2013 (6)
    • February 2013 (14)
    • January 2013 (19)
    • December 2012 (7)
    • November 2012 (3)
    • October 2012 (4)
    • September 2012 (2)
    • August 2012 (8)
    • July 2012 (5)
    • June 2012 (4)
    • May 2012 (11)
    • April 2012 (4)
    • March 2012 (3)
    • February 2012 (9)
    • January 2012 (6)
    • December 2011 (6)
    • November 2011 (5)
    • October 2011 (8)
    • September 2011 (3)
    • August 2011 (5)
    • July 2011 (5)
    • June 2011 (4)
    • May 2011 (8)
    • April 2011 (6)
    • March 2011 (2)
    • February 2011 (4)
    • January 2011 (4)
    • November 2010 (4)
    • October 2010 (1)
    • September 2010 (2)
    • August 2010 (3)
  • Categories

    • Art (53)
    • Books & Articles (24)
    • Building Codes (25)
    • Classic Cases (3)
    • Classical World (11)
    • Common Law Urbanism (49)
    • Courtyards and Alleys (6)
    • Dystopia (10)
    • Eminent Domain (7)
    • Euclidean Zoning (40)
    • Federalism (7)
    • Housing / Limited Equity (28)
    • Individual Rights (25)
    • Israel (4)
    • Land Surveying (7)
    • Late Victorian (35)
    • Law (26)
    • Leases (2)
    • Lower Manhattan (19)
    • Maps (10)
    • Mood Zoning (1)
    • Mortgages & Notes (7)
    • New Jersey Law (22)
    • Planning Theory (38)
    • Procedure (1)
    • Rail & T.O.D. (17)
    • Spotlights (44)
    • The Bronx (14)
    • Town Greens (15)
    • Trusts & Estates (9)
    • Uncategorized (36)
  • Pages

    • About
    • Consulting
    • Papers and Articles

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
%d bloggers like this: